From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Debug Methods in GDB Python
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 19:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r4hefx59.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGyQ6gxzG8vuPyFKHpacHS7W7jMEReidWDBkNJjywOXADXgVnw@mail.gmail.com> (Siva Chandra's message of "Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:49:08 -0800")
>>>>> "Siva" == Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com> writes:
Siva> Attached is a new version of the patch which I have now regression
Siva> tested. Except for tests and docs, I think it is complete wrt the
Siva> feature set I have in mind. Hence, the caveats from the previous mail
Siva> still apply.
I'm sorry about the delay here.
I think the approach is generally a good one.
I didn't read the overloading bits in detail. I'm not too concerned
about that though.
Siva> +static ULONGEST enabled_ext_languages = EXT_LANG_PYTHON;
I don't think we need this.
I'd rather just have this follow the "virtual methods" approach where a
function is an object that has whatever methods it needs, plus a
destructor.
Siva> + struct ext_fn_descriptor *ext_fn =
Siva> + (struct ext_fn_descriptor *) xzalloc (sizeof (struct ext_fn_descriptor));
FWIW, XCNEW encapsulates all this.
Siva> + if (item->is_method)
Siva> + {
Siva> + if (item->lang == EXT_LANG_PYTHON)
Siva> + py_free_ext_object (item->ext_object);
Siva> + }
... then here this could just call the destructor method, and not need
to know anything about Python specifically.
Siva> +struct ext_fn_descriptor *
Siva> +ext_fn_list_extend (struct ext_fn_descriptor *l1, struct ext_fn_descriptor *l2)
Siva> +{
Siva> + struct ext_fn_descriptor *item = l1;
Siva> +
Siva> + if (!l1)
Siva> + return l2;
Siva> +
Siva> + if (!l2)
Siva> + return l1;
Siva> +
Siva> + while (item->next)
Siva> + item = item->next;
Siva> +
Siva> + item->next = l2;
Why a linked list instead of a VEC?
We already have all this support code written for VECs.
Siva> +#ifdef HAVE_PYTHON
Siva> + if ((enabled_ext_languages && EXT_LANG_PYTHON)
Siva> + && (ext_fn->lang == EXT_LANG_PYTHON))
Siva> + new_ext_fn->ext_object = py_clone_ext_object (ext_fn->ext_object);
Siva> +#endif
This is the kind of thing that can be avoided with the virtual method
approach. Basically any #ifdef HAVE_PYTHON is suspect.
Lots of littler nits in the patch -- function comments, more things
should be 'static'.
Siva> +PyObject *
Siva> +gdbpy_enable_debug_methods (PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
Why is a special enabling method needed?
Siva> + if (PyCallable_Check (match_methods_temp)
Siva> + && PyCallable_Check (get_argtypes_temp)
Siva> + && PyCallable_Check (invoke_method_temp))
Siva> + {
...
Siva> + }
Siva> +
Siva> + return result;
This can return NULL without setting the exception.
Also, it does decrefs before increfs, but I think it is better to do
this the other way around.
Siva> + struct ext_fn_descriptor *ext_fn = new_ext_function ();
Siva> + struct py_ext_object *ext_object;
Siva> +
Siva> + ext_object = (struct py_ext_object *) xzalloc (sizeof (struct py_ext_object));
Siva> + ext_object->object = item;
Siva> + ext_object->match_py_obj_type = py_obj_type;
Siva> + ext_object->match_method = method;
Siva> +
Siva> + ext_fn->lang = EXT_LANG_PYTHON;
Siva> + ext_fn->is_method = 1;
Siva> + ext_fn->ext_object = (void *) ext_object;
Siva> +
Siva> + return ext_fn;
It seems like there should be a way to hang the needed data directly on
the ext_fn, say via subclassing.
Siva> +struct ext_fn_descriptor *
Siva> +py_debugmethod_name_match (struct type *obj_type, const char *method_name)
Siva> +{
Siva> + PyObject *py_type, *py_debugmethod_list = NULL, *list_iter, *item;
Siva> + struct cleanup *cleanups;
Siva> + struct ext_fn_descriptor *method_list = NULL;
Siva> +
Siva> + if (!obj_type || !match_methods_callable)
Siva> + return NULL;
Siva> +
Siva> + cleanups = ensure_python_env (get_current_arch (), current_language);
I don't think this is thread-safe.
ensure_python_env acquires the GIL, but this checks
match_methods_callable outside the lock.
Siva> + list_iter = PyObject_GetIter (py_debugmethod_list);
Siva> + while ((item = PyIter_Next (list_iter)))
Error check for list_iter.
Siva> + {
Siva> + struct ext_fn_descriptor *ext_fn;
Siva> +
Siva> + ext_fn = new_python_ext_method (item, py_type, method_name);
Siva> + method_list = ext_fn_list_prepend (method_list, ext_fn);
Siva> + }
Siva> +
Siva> + Py_DECREF (list_iter);
Need an error check here too -- the loop may exit with an error.
Siva> + py_argtype_list = PyObject_CallFunction (get_argtypes_callable,
Siva> + "OOs",
Siva> + ext_object->object,
Siva> + ext_object->match_py_obj_type,
Siva> + ext_object->match_method);
Siva> +
Siva> + list_iter = PyObject_GetIter (py_argtype_list);
Error checking here and elsewhere.
Siva> + { "enable_debug_methods", gdbpy_enable_debug_methods, METH_VARARGS,
Siva> + "inferiors (meth_match_function, args_match_function) -> None.\n\
Siva> +Enables Python debug methods feature." },
Wrong doc string.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-10 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-07 21:22 Siva Chandra
2013-01-29 1:51 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-25 23:02 ` Siva Chandra
2013-05-10 19:33 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2013-05-10 19:55 ` Siva Chandra
2013-05-14 19:33 ` Tom Tromey
2013-06-17 19:10 ` Siva Chandra
2013-07-22 20:47 ` Tom Tromey
2013-11-12 2:56 ` Siva Chandra
2013-11-15 22:28 ` Tom Tromey
2013-11-16 0:05 ` Siva Chandra
2013-11-16 0:54 ` Doug Evans
2013-11-16 1:03 ` Siva Chandra
2013-11-16 2:48 ` Siva Chandra
2013-11-20 0:03 ` Doug Evans
2013-11-19 23:52 ` Doug Evans
2013-11-20 0:39 ` Siva Chandra
2013-11-20 2:48 ` Doug Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r4hefx59.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sivachandra@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox