From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4217 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2013 17:00:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4208 invoked by uid 89); 2 Aug 2013 17:00:42 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 17:00:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r72H0XXu002202 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 13:00:33 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-128.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.128]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r72H01It024421 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 13:00:08 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: Keith Seitz , gdb-patches Subject: Re: [RFA] remove duplicates in search_symbols References: <8738r68uze.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20986.62497.975502.698564@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <51FB2A02.6080703@redhat.com> <87pptwdx41.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 17:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Fri, 2 Aug 2013 09:53:29 -0700") Message-ID: <87r4ecc9ke.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> /* Symbol searching */ Doug> /* Note: struct symbol_search, search_symbols, et.al. are declared Doug> here, Doug> instead of making them local to symtab.c, for gdbtk's sake. */ Funny. Doug> [I could make it more prevalent though. Say a comment at the Doug> definition site of each function or some such?] I hope the above is good enough. I didn't notice it once, but OTOH that implies that I'd probably miss other comments as well. Tom