From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9225 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2014 15:08:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9215 invoked by uid 89); 13 Feb 2014 15:08:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:08:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1DF80l9012275 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:08:01 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-148.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.148]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1DF7xAJ011609 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:08:00 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Yao Qi Cc: Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/9] move some rsp bits into rsp-low.h References: <1391714966-12125-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <1391714966-12125-3-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <52FC89A6.8010806@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:08:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <52FC89A6.8010806@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:00:22 +0800") Message-ID: <87r477qcds.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00469.txt.bz2 Yao> We also need to compile rsp-low.c for IPA, and link rsp-low-ipa.o Yao> in IPA. I get the ipa build error below, Sorry Yao. Could you mention again what version of UST is supported? I tried just now with: barimba. rpm -q lttng-ust-devel lttng-ust-devel-2.0.8-1.fc18.x86_64 but it doesn't work: checking for ust... no Tom