From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-16737-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 24941 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2002 05:04:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 24925 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2002 05:04:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO gash2.peakpeak.com) (207.174.178.17)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jul 2002 05:04:46 -0000
Received: from fleche.redhat.com (ta0205.peakpeak.com [204.144.244.205])
	by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA13059;
	Mon, 8 Jul 2002 23:04:34 -0600
Received: by fleche.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 0E0F84F82B5; Mon,  8 Jul 2002 23:12:15 -0600 (MDT)
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Which autoheader?
References: <3D2A658A.1060100@ges.redhat.com>
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com
X-Attribution:  Tom
X-Zippy:  On the road, ZIPPY is a pinhead without a purpose, but never
 without a POINT.
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 22:10:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <3D2A658A.1060100@ges.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <87ptxxfpsh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00140.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com> writes:

Andrew> Which version of autoheader did you use when re-generating
Andrew> config.in?  I'm finding that, using 000227, I can't reproduce
Andrew> config.in.

fleche. autoheader --version
Autoconf version 2.13

This is the autoconf in Red Hat Linux 7.3.
One hopes it hasn't been modified from the net release very heavily.

What is 000227?
I've never heard of an autoconf release named that way.

What does your autoheader generate for config.in?

Looking more closely, I see I checked in a config.in that includes
PACKAGE -- but the configure.in patch hasn't yet been accepted for
gdb.  This definition is bogus but harmless.  Is that what you're
seeing?  If so I can revert that patch easily.

Tom