From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23229 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2009 16:15:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 23205 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jul 2009 16:15:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-qy0-f198.google.com (HELO mail-qy0-f198.google.com) (209.85.221.198) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:15:44 +0000 Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so1195048qyk.12 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.67.132 with SMTP id r4mr8643885qai.212.1248884141530; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hydrogen.gmail.com (207-172-203-39.c3-0.upd-ubr7.trpr-upd.pa.cable.rcn.com [207.172.203.39]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm953184qwj.46.2009.07.29.09.15.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:15:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <87prbjqxco.wl%naesten@gmail.com> From: Samuel Bronson To: Ralf Wildenhues , tromey@redhat.com, Samuel Bronson , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Update rebuild rules in non-automake directories. In-Reply-To: <20090729053050.GC28894@gmx.de> References: <20090628183334.GA5401@gmx.de> <20090728181748.GA3134@gmx.de> <87skggqwep.wl%naesten@gmail.com> <20090729053050.GC28894@gmx.de> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.3 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00711.txt.bz2 At Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:30:50 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > About the changes that should go upstream, are you saying I should get > them accepted upstream before they can go into gdb / src? Just so you know, I can't *say* anything of the kind; I can only suggest. And I wasn't trying to do anything of the sort. But I expect that question was for Tom (who can say that kind of thing, but doesn't seem to have been, afaict)?