From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9085 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2012 21:03:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 9074 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Mar 2012 21:03:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 21:03:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q29L3gns024514 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:03:42 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q29L3f2m005051 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:03:42 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Refactor internal variable mechanism References: Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 21:03:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Sergio Durigan Junior's message of "Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:32:02 -0300") Message-ID: <87pqclij0y.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00359.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Sergio" == Sergio Durigan Junior writes: Sergio> This is the first patch, which refactors the internal variable Sergio> mechanism. It creates new methods, for example to compile an internal Sergio> variable into agent expression. Sergio> Is this OK to check-in? I intend to approve this one but I would like to wait for other comments first. Really I'm replying now to point out a nit :) Sergio> +/* Implementation of `thread' variable. */ Sergio> + Sergio> +static struct internalvar_funcs thread_funcs = This one should be 'const' like the others are. Tom