From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5762 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2012 16:38:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 5421 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Sep 2012 16:38:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:37:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8BGbWTJ015746 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:37:32 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8BGbUWa019315 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:37:31 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Mircea Gherzan Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, mgherzan@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add the -catch-load and -catch-unload MI commands. References: <1346320317-1599-1-git-send-email-mircea.gherzan@intel.com> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1346320317-1599-1-git-send-email-mircea.gherzan@intel.com> (Mircea Gherzan's message of "Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:51:57 +0200") Message-ID: <87pq5sa52t.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00160.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Mircea" == Mircea Gherzan writes: Mircea> They are equivalent to "catch load" and "catch unload" from CLI. Mircea> Rationale: GUIs might be interested in catching solib load or Mircea> unload events. This looks reasonable to me. This needs a documentation patch, to describe the new commands, and also new test cases. Tom