From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7109 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2013 21:20:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 7049 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Feb 2013 21:20:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:19:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1CLJv7g026040 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:19:57 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1CLJtRE003597 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:19:56 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch+doc] New gdbinit.5 man page References: <20130211201401.GA25391@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83621x5x7d.fsf@gnu.org> <20130212162141.GA4287@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:20:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130212162141.GA4287@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:21:41 +0100") Message-ID: <87pq05mdqc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00290.txt.bz2 Jan> It is in fact Tom's idea to make the man pages in texinfo: I think it is worth doing if it makes maintenance simpler at all. This approach has worked ok for gcc for a long time now. Tom