From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6557 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2014 15:13:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25362 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jul 2014 14:42:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:42:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6TEgUGl030765 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:42:30 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-151.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.151]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6TEgSY5017937 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:42:29 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Anthony Green Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [Patch] merge config.sub from upstream References: <871tt45ssq.fsf@moxielogic.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:14:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <871tt45ssq.fsf@moxielogic.com> (Anthony Green's message of "Tue, 29 Jul 2014 07:05:25 -0400") Message-ID: <87ppgocjl7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00741.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Green writes: Anthony> I'm committing this change on the assumption that upstream Anthony> config.{sub|guess} merges are auto-approved, as is done in GCC. This Anthony> brings binutils-gdb in line with upstream config and GCC sources. Just FYI I think it's the norm to courtesy CC binutils. Tom