From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id T4mnGsSvi2AQXAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:20:36 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 4429E1F11C; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:20:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BD1A1E813 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:20:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F69399C008; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 07:20:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 41F69399C008 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1619767234; bh=Ne9zYnmYGXMB+l7roECHyTxrHgmBl4fpJ+JZkQNl81w=; h=To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=sKmtJxXYJCR+DM32F/XQNM3dtPMazt/4cR63eSep8WRzwisSTcOr3vkIeyiFH70Hf i13kjbE8WVuE1GikstabMVMAKbOEqG62eaDHJdg32UUfx0H/nz65VapyYdM8pMYQJc bd6rJnD6MwppMiP4V1bqRCdjNctZakvELNxUeqq8= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E7F38515E7 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 07:20:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org D6E7F38515E7 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-457-i6FRP_jvM9CWZnPZSt8t1g-1; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:20:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: i6FRP_jvM9CWZnPZSt8t1g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAA1B1A8A64; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 07:20:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (ovpn-115-124.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.124]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17E81100EB3D; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 07:20:23 +0000 (UTC) To: Emil Velikov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nptl_db: Support different libpthread/ld.so load orders (bug 27744) References: <87czuum5yb.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87pmyq4k4k.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <875z08nczm.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:20:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <875z08nczm.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (Florian Weimer's message of "Tue, 27 Apr 2021 14:11:41 +0200") Message-ID: <87pmyc9r23.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Florian Weimer via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Florian Weimer Cc: Pedro Alves , Emil Velikov via Libc-alpha , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" * Florian Weimer: > * Emil Velikov: > >> On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 11:57, Florian Weimer wrote: >> >>> > Are there any plans for glibc 2.33.1 or shall I ask the Arch Linux >>> > maintainers to include this in the package? >>> >>> I'm going to backport it to the release branch, but we probably won't >>> make an actual 2.33.1 release from it. So it depends on what Arch Linux >>> does with the release branch. > >> I can see the patch landed in master \o/ but it's missing in the 2.33 branch. >> Did it slip through the cracks or you're simply EBUSY with the >> nptl/c11 pthread to libc transition? > > I wanted to give it a test in Fedora rawhide, but we cannot rebuild > glibc there due to an unrelated issue right now. > > I can backport it blindly if it helps. I've now backported it to the 2.33 release branch. Thanks, Florian