From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20148 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2012 15:12:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 20133 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Mar 2012 15:11:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:11:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2EFBhVJ004570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:11:43 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2EFBfHH011363 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:11:42 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] attach-fail-reasons: Say more than ptrace: Operation not permitted. References: <20120306061710.GB24004@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F58BA4A.9090903@redhat.com> <20120313094307.GA25939@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F5F226F.5090304@redhat.com> <20120313135457.GA8363@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120313135457.GA8363@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:54:57 +0100") Message-ID: <87obrzdxoy.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00479.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> Offtopic here but I think this code was another argument for C++, Jan> wasn't it? Yeah; but my sense was there was also general agreement that, even if we switch gdb, we won't switch gdbserver. Tom