From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18421 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2012 15:18:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 18411 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2012 15:18:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:18:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3HFII32025756 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:18:18 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3HFIGBI020091 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:18:17 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: bfd_section should not be NULL in call to prim_record_minimal_* References: <1334610821-10974-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <87zkaawp9g.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120417151549.GN2852@adacore.com> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120417151549.GN2852@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Tue, 17 Apr 2012 08:15:49 -0700") Message-ID: <87obqqv13b.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00489.txt.bz2 Joel> Yes, I agree. I read the entire thread, and it seems so simple to Joel> fix the problem that way as well. I think both approaches should Joel> be applied. Could you test my patch, applied to an unpatched gdb, on AIX? If it works for you I will write a ChangeLog entry and check it in. I don't have a good way to test it here AFAIK. Tom