From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3172 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2012 20:11:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 3162 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jul 2012 20:11:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:11:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6IKBMa9002183 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:11:22 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6IKBLEh024658 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:11:22 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Keith Seitz Cc: "gp \>\> \"gdb-patches\@sourceware.org ml\"" Subject: Re: [RFA] Cleanup: Use add_sal_to_sals for expressions References: <5005D93D.7020808@redhat.com> <878veh3u4z.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <50070B0D.2050002@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:11:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <50070B0D.2050002@redhat.com> (Keith Seitz's message of "Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:14:21 -0700") Message-ID: <87obnc25jq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00301.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz writes: Keith> As much as I hate to extend the API for add_sal_to_sals (especially Keith> for a special case like this), but I really want [to try?] to isolate Keith> name canonicalization in one place, and add_sal_to_sals seems like the Keith> best candidate for that. Seems reasonable to me. Keith> So, what do you think of this revised patch? [No regressions on x86-64 Keith> linux.] Ok. Tom