From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7486 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2013 16:31:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 7464 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jan 2013 16:31:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:31:50 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0IGVkpn008889 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:31:47 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0IGVivY002071 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:31:45 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: catch SIGSEGV in the demangler References: <87fw23o70u.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <19236.9665638127$1358374641@news.gmane.org> <87622vd2vd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <50F93081.1090905@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:31:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <50F93081.1090905@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:22:41 +0000") Message-ID: <87obgm8nbj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00439.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> The original idea was to do return instead of raise: Pedro> +static void Pedro> +handle_segv (int sig) Pedro> +{ Pedro> + struct gdb_exception except; Pedro> + Pedro> + if (!in_demangler) Pedro> + { Pedro> + signal (sig, SIG_DFL); Pedro> + return; Pedro> + } This works fine, but has the effect of causing gdb to ignore an explicit 'kill -SEGV'. I had to hack "maint dump-me" to really see it work. Tom