From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24058 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2014 20:37:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24041 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jun 2014 20:37:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:37:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s5CKbLfg017932 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:37:21 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-103.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.103]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s5CKbJIQ030794 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:37:20 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] let gdbserver use libiberty References: <1390243792-31176-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1390243792-31176-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:49:50 -0700") Message-ID: <87oaxxrhj4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00528.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> This series changes gdbserver to build its own copy of libiberty Tom> (using ACX_CONFIGURE_DIR) and then link against it. I've needed this Tom> at least once (for a cloexec patch) and I've seen other situations Tom> where it would have been useful. This series slipped through the cracks somehow. I'm going to push it now. I believe I addressed all the review comments upthread. I rebased it and rebuilt it on x86-64 Fedora 20; let me know if you encounter any problems. thanks, Tom