From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31670 invoked by alias); 25 Aug 2015 18:35:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31077 invoked by uid 89); 25 Aug 2015 18:35:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 18:35:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6ACF8E3D1 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 18:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unused-10-15-17-51.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.17.51]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7PIZ7Ys022473 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:35:08 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Pedro Alves Cc: GDB Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] Increase timeout on gdb.base/exitsignal.exp References: <1440481342-25971-1-git-send-email-sergiodj@redhat.com> <55DC46C5.4050808@redhat.com> <87si77gr9x.fsf@redhat.com> <55DCB471.4020103@redhat.com> X-URL: http://blog.sergiodj.net Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 18:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <55DCB471.4020103@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:31:13 +0100") Message-ID: <87oahvgqsl.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00736.txt.bz2 On Tuesday, August 25 2015, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 08/25/2015 07:24 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > >>> This (many instances) doesn't make sense to me. And I think wouldn't >>> fix anything. Seems to me the bumped timeout, if any, should be around >>> the continue that caused the first time out: >>> >>> # Continue until the end. >>> gdb_test "continue" "Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV.*" \ >>> "program terminated with SIGSEGV" >> >> Sorry, I am confused... The timeout does not occur on this command: it >> occurs on the print commands. So I think we must extend the timeout for >> the print commands; don't we? > > Not AFAICS from what you pasted. The print time outs seem to me to be > cascading fails. Highlighting what you pasted: Oh, you're right, I missed that (don't know how) when I was creating the patch. Thanks for the catch; I'll update the patch. -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/