From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint-tailcall.exp with gcc 16
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:49:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o6fnmfpy.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731093508.3717972-1-tdevries@suse.de>
Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes:
> On openSUSE Leap 16.0, with gcc 15.3.0, for test-case
> gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint-tailcall.exp I get:
> ...
> (gdb) python MyFinishBreakpoint(frame)
> Temporary breakpoint 2 at 0x40102a: file py-finish-breakpoint-tailcall.c, \
> line 43.
> (gdb) PASS: $exp: parent_frame=true: create finish breakpoint
> ...
>
> And on openSUSE Tumbleweed, with gcc 16.1.1 I get instead:
> ...
> (gdb) python MyFinishBreakpoint(frame)
> Temporary breakpoint 2 at 0x40102a: file py-finish-breakpoint-tailcall.c, \
> line 44.
> (gdb) FAIL: $exp: parent_frame=true: create finish breakpoint
> ...
>
> The only difference is in the line numbers, 43 and 44, both in main:
> ...
> 39 int
> 40 main (void)
> 41 {
> 42 int result = tailcall_function (42);
> 43 result -= global_var; /* Temporary breakpoint here. */
> 44 return result;
> 45 }
> ...
>
> The executable is compiled with O2, and the code for main is different.
>
> With gcc 15, we have:
> ...
> 0000000000401020 <main>:
> 401020: bf 2a 00 00 00 mov $0x2a,%edi
> 401025: e8 26 01 00 00 call 401150 <tailcall_function>
> 40102a: 8b 15 e0 2f 00 00 mov 0x2fe0(%rip),%edx
> 401030: 29 d0 sub %edx,%eax
> 401032: c3 ret
> ...
> and the line number associated with 0x40102a, the first instruction after the
> call is 43:
> ...
> File name Line number Starting address View Stmt
> py-finish-breakpoint-tailcall.c 43 0x40102a x
> ...
>
> With gcc 16, the mov and sub have been merged:
> ...
> 0000000000401020 <main>:
> 401020: bf 2a 00 00 00 mov $0x2a,%edi
> 401025: e8 26 01 00 00 call 401150 <tailcall_function>
> 40102a: 2b 05 e0 2f 00 00 sub 0x2fe0(%rip),%eax
> 401030: c3 ret
> ...
> and the line number info is different:
> ...
> File name Line number Starting address View Stmt
> py-finish-breakpoint-tailcall.c 43 0x40102a x
> py-finish-breakpoint-tailcall.c 44 0x40102a 1 x
> py-finish-breakpoint-tailcall.c 43 0x40102a 2
> ...
> and gdb picks 44 in this case.
>
> Fix this by merging lines 43 and 44 in the test-case:
> ...
> - result -= global_var; /* Temporary breakpoint here. */
> - return result;
> + return result - global_var; /* Temporary breakpoint here. */
> ...
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux.
>
> I've also verified that reverting the fix in commit e6bdfed6f5d ("gdb: fix
> frame_unwind_caller_WHAT functions for inline and tail calls"), the commit
> that introduced the test-case still makes the test-case fail.
Thanks for taking the time to do this. This fix LGTM.
Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33989
> ---
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint-tailcall.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint-tailcall.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint-tailcall.c
> index d129d7e41b4..844ac1d2ea6 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint-tailcall.c
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint-tailcall.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,5 @@ int
> main (void)
> {
> int result = tailcall_function (42);
> - result -= global_var; /* Temporary breakpoint here. */
> - return result;
> + return result - global_var; /* Temporary breakpoint here. */
> }
>
> base-commit: 6d1be0b90e837e4c82eaaf6f9e8c7da7227902e1
> --
> 2.51.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 9:35 Tom de Vries
2026-07-31 13:49 ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o6fnmfpy.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox