Re: [PATCH 5/5] gdb/doc: more @command and @kbd

[Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
>> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:54:30 +0100
>> 
>> I spotted some places in the docs where we used @code{...} to wrap a
>> command name when we should be using @command{...}.  This commit
>> started off with me just trying to fix these.
>> 
>> Some cases can get a little confusing though.  Consider the
>> documentation that discusses the GDB 'make' command.  In talking about
>> what this GDB command does the documentation references the external
>> program 'make', which needs wrapping in @command{}, but there are also
>> mentions of the GDB command itself, which needs wrapping with @kbd{}.
>> 
>> As these all seemed related I've tried to clean up as many of these as
>> I could find.  As such, this commit is mostly changing things like
>> @code and @samp to @command and @kbd as needed.
>> ---
>>  gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>  1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
> Thanks, this is okay, with a couple of nits below fixed.
>
>>  @item GNU make
>>  @value{GDBN}'s build system relies on features only found in the GNU
>> -make program.  Other variants of @code{make} will not work.
>> +make program.  Other variants of @command{make} will not work.
>    ^^^^
> This should also be in @command.
>
>> -To build @code{gdb} in a separate directory, run @file{configure}
>> +To build @code{gdb} in a separate directory, run @command{configure}
>             ^^^^^^^^^^
> This should use @value{GDBN}.
>
> Approved-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>

Eli,

I addressed the nits you pointed out and pushed this series.

Thanks,
Andrew