From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29866 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2012 16:05:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 29854 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Apr 2012 16:05:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:05:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3RG4sbF010351 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:04:54 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3RG4qYo027984 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:04:53 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Tristan Gingold Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org ml" Subject: Re: [RFA] Emit a warning for ineffective set VAR = EXP command References: <8781499A-A489-42D0-80B1-75136331DBDB@adacore.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <8781499A-A489-42D0-80B1-75136331DBDB@adacore.com> (Tristan Gingold's message of "Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:28:30 +0200") Message-ID: <87mx5x40uz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg01014.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tristan" == Tristan Gingold writes: Tristan> I simply propose to emit a warning if the expression is not an Tristan> assignment (or a comma expression). It seems reasonable to me. Tristan> Ok for trunk ? I think there should be a test case. Tom