From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-95998-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6193 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2012 20:22:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 6182 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2012 20:22:48 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:22:40 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAFKMcmj023326	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:22:38 -0500
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAFKMaMb017099	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:22:37 -0500
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [2/10] RFC: remove gdb_string.h
References: <87obiyzns7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<87vcd6y8pm.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83390atys7.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:22:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <83390atys7.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 15 Nov	2012 22:08:08 +0200")
Message-ID: <87mwyiwr8z.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00436.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

Eli> Why do we need the gnulib module?  Why not just assume the ANSI C
Eli> string.h header?

For string.h maybe we could.
I don't mind dropping this module.

For strstr and strerror, it seems that gnulib fixes some actual bugs.

Tom