From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26951 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2012 21:55:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 26940 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Nov 2012 21:55:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:55:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qASLsw2d017249 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:54:58 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qASLsvrX026459 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:54:57 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Marcus Shawcroft Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] AArch64 GDB and GDBSERVER Port V2 References: <50AD0303.5030100@arm.com> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:55:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <50AD0303.5030100@arm.com> (Marcus Shawcroft's message of "Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:36:19 +0000") Message-ID: <87mwy18kb2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00831.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Marcus" == Marcus Shawcroft writes: Marcus> This patch contains the base AArch64 port for GDB. I'm not really the right person to comment on most of this series, but I did have a couple questions. Marcus> +#include Is this strictly necessary? Marcus> + tdep = xcalloc (1, sizeof (struct gdbarch_tdep)); Marcus> + gdbarch = gdbarch_alloc (&info, tdep); [... fill it in ...] I wonder if you plan to port the various gdbarch 'sdt' bits. It usually isn't very hard; e.g., see arm-linux-tdep.c. Tom