From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-96727-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31298 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2012 18:42:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 31205 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2012 18:42:13 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 18:42:09 +0000
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB7Ig7G2031109	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Fri, 7 Dec 2012 13:42:07 -0500
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB7Ig6aG023119	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Fri, 7 Dec 2012 13:42:06 -0500
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: =?utf-8?B?QW5kcsOpIFDDtm5pdHo=?= <andre.poenitz@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de>,        gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"
References: <874nkpv03j.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<20121202093807.GA21883@host2.jankratochvil.net>	<87y5hfvu5v.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<20121203193713.GA10256@host2.jankratochvil.net>	<87obibvsb1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<20121203202233.GA23933@klara.mpi.htwm.de>	<20121203203126.GA13490@host2.jankratochvil.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 18:42:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20121203203126.GA13490@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan	Kratochvil's message of "Mon, 3 Dec 2012 21:31:26 +0100")
Message-ID: <87mwxpvh4y.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.90 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00200.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

Jan> body=[bkpt={number="1",type="catchpoint",disp="keep",enabled="y",what="<signal>",signal=["SIGINT","SIGTRAP"],times="0"}]

I see now that the "type" field for catchpoints is not very useful.

I think we should make that change depending on the particular type of
catchpoint that is installed.  Thoughts on this?

Tom