From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16575 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2013 18:16:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16566 invoked by uid 89); 17 Jul 2013 18:16:00 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:16:00 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6HIFpt3001119 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:15:51 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-128.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.128]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6HIFnTU005488 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:15:50 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Andrew Pinski Cc: Will Newton , "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" , Patch Tracking Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads: Make sure TLS tests link against pthreads. References: <51B22910.7010208@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:16:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Andrew Pinski's message of "Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:02:34 -0700") Message-ID: <87mwplf3xn.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00409.txt.bz2 Andrew> I think this should be an debian/Ubuntu local only patch as the Andrew> default for FSF GCC/binutils is not to pass --as-needed. If that is the only reason, then I think it is still ok in principle to use the patch. It won't hurt the FSF default case. Tom