From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19447 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2013 17:58:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19438 invoked by uid 89); 1 Aug 2013 17:58:44 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 17:58:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r71Hwalh006566 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:58:36 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-128.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.128]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r71HwZrJ021874 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:58:36 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] add caching procs to test suite References: <1374073124-23602-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <1374073124-23602-5-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <51FA9663.80101@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 17:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <51FA9663.80101@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Thu, 01 Aug 2013 18:09:55 +0100") Message-ID: <87mwp1fg38.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: >> - # Use the cached value, if it exists. Cache value per "board" to handle >> - # runs with multiple options (e.g. unix/{-m32,-64}) correctly. Pedro> Is this not a concern with the new scheme? I thought it wasn't, but I see now that gdb_do_cache only incorporates this into the cache file name, not the variable name. Thanks for catching this. I'll fix it. Pedro> IMO, if you stripped out the GDB_PARALLEL bits, this Pedro> should stand on its own as cleanup, and could go Pedro> in first... No problem. Tom