From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-109395-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2861 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2014 11:41:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 2844 invoked by uid 89); 16 Jan 2014 11:40:59 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: aserp1040.oracle.com
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (HELO aserp1040.oracle.com) (141.146.126.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:40:59 +0000
Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237])	by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id s0GBepYZ032679	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:40:51 GMT
Received: from aserz7021.oracle.com (aserz7021.oracle.com [141.146.126.230])	by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0GBenAP026713	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);	Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:40:50 GMT
Received: from abhmp0014.oracle.com (abhmp0014.oracle.com [141.146.116.20])	by aserz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0GBenHw026704;	Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:40:49 GMT
Received: from termi.oracle.com (/10.175.8.9)	by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0)	with ESMTP ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 03:40:49 -0800
From: jose.marchesi@oracle.com (Jose E. Marchesi)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, binutils@sourceware.org,        gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: small request regarding commits in binutils-gdb.git
References: <20140115121251.GM4639@adacore.com> <83mwix44gh.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:41:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <83mwix44gh.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 15 Jan	2014 18:03:58 +0200")
Message-ID: <87mwiwcftg.fsf@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00597.txt.bz2

    
    > I am also considering the idea of writing a small hook that
    > would reject new commits introducing commits where the "empty line
    > after subject" rule is not followed. Would that be an acceptable
    > restriction?
    
    No objections from me.

Same here.