From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1546 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2014 22:52:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 1537 invoked by uid 89); 12 Oct 2014 22:52:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 12 Oct 2014 22:52:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s9CMqlIc019502 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 12 Oct 2014 18:52:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (dhcp-10-15-16-169.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.16.169]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s9CMqkot007263 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 12 Oct 2014 18:52:46 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Cc: Doug Evans , gdb-patches Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] Add support to catch groups of syscalls. References: <1412736678-2760-1-git-send-email-gabriel@krisman.be> <1412736678-2760-3-git-send-email-gabriel@krisman.be> <87h9zebcsb.fsf@redhat.com> <87siiy9vis.fsf@redhat.com> <87k34555se.fsf@anubis.Home> X-URL: http://blog.sergiodj.net Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 22:52:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87k34555se.fsf@anubis.Home> (Gabriel Krisman Bertazi's message of "Sun, 12 Oct 2014 18:36:49 -0300") Message-ID: <87mw90uchu.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00306.txt.bz2 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 929 On Sunday, October 12 2014, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: > I dislike the proposal of adding prefixes/suffixes to the group names > because I feel it might be harder to type, and also because it feels a > little unusual, if we consider the common way of providing arguments to > commands. > > Using -g to specify syscall groups, as Sergio said, has also the > advantage of providing us with an intuitive command to list available > syscall groups, by saying "catch syscall -g" with no arguments. > > So, my vote goes to using '-g' for each syscall group we want to > catch. Is that ok for you, guys? Yeah, this is still OK to me :-). > I will still wait a few days to see if anyone has more suggestions > before sending the updated patch that fixes the syntax and the other > things you guys pointed out. Good idea. Thanks, --=20 Sergio GPG key ID: 0x65FC5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 818 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUOwY9AAoJENDrdihl/F42ydAP/1glCqS3jnb4YtISrsM6YMLB zHY+0HYk6D7vphi2MB2erubW7oM/R/VcJefurEJNm2LifhEWTBDNSKIRLT2oFFNq ZK97LAi6/NqQygz+t1WShiz9oW52ttyrXKb4OTrCejmUcNVYvtxjIvUTV8mcAmmP iJQjwI4GOQxnqxTc+/w4gsUIFrfyDQtlXNW+UqsPjUs5NbaYr46yIIQ+hJWbmYvg EZbBJrPlC7/8hY7ADf2zfWp2jBMyTbU2jVRqrADeqWm0N4IiPvkB0qkAd9fndsEp 3oOAhEszNdM1v1pPFDzn4I3cOPxAwqq9coHuO5rmGeKJp8jGgrGqs3zD6qig08w8 0xWAKnfiBh5rN51CLQMCHxQbdUbZmSBpVIf/07TPxR0F2wq5L/t04WDWYDYgWgzq L1PtyeaLLfYo8DwHFx8/GbF7b4zEtDXZCtU2CY6i5N2y0r69FlVQMcoJSvFmEybe Y834aRBJhzRtTwP5THJlZES7zLTL9ycyYbGxuEBRK/W99ghMnoQyYvIk+JXZnPPS kfTiIhKOLc2V+Qjko15CP6oSdaimiFiiTMcTJQSKHaxsRZyOL+kL7QlIwKZA7GUW m6ipyyP8jhpG+OmPjQ/2nPjdD2mkqxAEos92FIbt0HVKwZ/0Ug2Dy9eyiVlovmQq 0oLWeHIhnsXspIMgR0pA =lbcs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--