From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 127346 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2018 19:32:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 127335 invoked by uid 89); 8 Oct 2018 19:32:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.156.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 19:32:56 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w98JTERZ105410 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 15:32:54 -0400 Received: from e14.ny.us.ibm.com (e14.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.204]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2n0axfpnvb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 15:32:54 -0400 Received: from localhost by e14.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 15:32:53 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.26) by e14.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.201) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 8 Oct 2018 15:32:50 -0400 Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.111]) by b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w98JWneq38273146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 8 Oct 2018 19:32:49 GMT Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED1DAC060; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 15:31:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B70AC059; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 15:31:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pedro.localdomain (unknown [9.18.235.118]) by b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 15:31:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by pedro.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 097DB3C03BF; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 16:32:47 -0300 (-03) From: Pedro Franco de Carvalho To: Jan Kratochvil , Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, uweigand@de.ibm.com, edjunior@gmail.com Subject: Re: ping: [PATCH v4 00/12] GDB support for more powerpc registers on linux In-Reply-To: <20181008190930.GA725707@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20180815000608.26840-1-pedromfc@linux.ibm.com> <87wosqntwa.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <0f08d344-7096-c9fc-6eed-0215d3f63001@redhat.com> <20181008190930.GA725707@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 19:32:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain x-cbid: 18100819-0052-0000-0000-0000033FA312 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009843; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000267; SDB=6.01099792; UDB=6.00568965; IPR=6.00879841; MB=3.00023667; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-10-08 19:32:51 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18100819-0053-0000-0000-00005E57B972 Message-Id: <87murokzdt.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-10/txt/msg00184.txt.bz2 Jan Kratochvil writes: > On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 19:00:19 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: >> I was reading through the series as you sent this. I sent a couple >> comments to patches #12 and #14. The remarks in #12 is something that can >> always be addressed with this series already merged. Re. the comments for #14, >> it would be nice to go over the series and add missing intro comments to >> functions, etc. Otherwise, it all LGTM. > > Is this the only reason why this patch series hasn't been checked in yet? There was some further discussion after that comment about #12. There are some differences in one of the note sections generated by the kernel for a core file and the one generated by GDB. I'm working on resolving this, sorry for the delay! -- Pedro Franco de Carvalho