From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id n0MaJP2A+GVOjwwAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:59:25 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key; unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=fMkyYuSf; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 810711E0BB; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:59:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 653751E08C for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:59:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE8F385840C for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:59:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from omta34.uswest2.a.cloudfilter.net (omta34.uswest2.a.cloudfilter.net [35.89.44.33]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2C743858D37 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:59:02 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org A2C743858D37 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org A2C743858D37 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=35.89.44.33 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710784744; cv=none; b=ASuD/Z/rnsGEnmtNk3cprr43FEsKO1ZP+6jiB1cfdmDwBnWXBOUcWwzkjf0YheCwUJ0FIfO22uB1fzfmSZQ/R2yG8Xixn9c2qsBRab/mV97C97MVFIiaCb4cJTX+Mu3OMnO0n7yVOt4xpwmGECggCxsdo/BKLCm3Or9TLMx57EM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710784744; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bxx7nN6UDiRT+zqlcW8dS8yRTRtAFi7hk1Ybh454viI=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=gp4o01cEwG3h30o3QcuexvzxlhaFfbyQsAGnIZJZgcVGkmhXXQY3zYmtchu5rHh3RaewhzH5kJYX7EtP9SsueSNLyyU1cr14y81kJ2E/WlJJoMm63SWyBZnQfWLZW52DGyGJ1lDmb4diEb3YxJOSYpbuulRoXUbUtPyGGd6KJ0Q= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from eig-obgw-6004a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.0.30.197]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id mCo7rkMg7HXmAmHGHrKzzG; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:59:01 +0000 Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id mHGGrUCZN7QepmHGHr4SML; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:59:01 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=CMAsXwrD c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=65f880e5 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=K6JAEmCyrfEA:10 a=Qbun_eYptAEA:10 a=eozlpRJXrsCl4GQkSrIA:9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=bxx7nN6UDiRT+zqlcW8dS8yRTRtAFi7hk1Ybh454viI=; b=fMkyYuSfCtRcoE++Et2/dxBpEE 53dcHBnjM0TMuHYS8gFqPCVrTWXMWVJD9kviWz7I6lobTRbRrn116ce/VLjUUn+rvJhViKhUVZmn9 8oD0gSBBVDGnUXp+67+l3LYO2; Received: from 97-122-82-115.hlrn.qwest.net ([97.122.82.115]:51092 helo=prentzel) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rmHGG-0041eB-28; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:59:00 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Dmitry Neverov Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC v2][PR symtab/30520] gdb/symtab: fix the gdb.cp/anon-struct test References: <20240123170325.752251-1-dmitry.neverov@jetbrains.com> <20240125084404.3536456-1-dmitry.neverov@jetbrains.com> <87y1bw9g3b.fsf@tromey.com> <87v86x77i1.fsf@tromey.com> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:58:59 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Neverov's message of "Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:35:50 +0100") Message-ID: <87msqvto9o.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 97.122.82.115 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1rmHGG-0041eB-28 X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 97-122-82-115.hlrn.qwest.net (prentzel) [97.122.82.115]:51092 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 7 X-Org: HG=bhshared;ORG=bluehost; X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfIrS4De99N6ewCzMzVmsqiFKjCAD0qGDaOR/GrA36v2u6VCHtQI6v/oarrZbmWhRZfXFVPumtlxjzHJcgn839hVoTb5ls+NPEYRVucltBYBPe0KuDAJE mtC8XVJagb8d4UAfzWFarZ6Ig4mCOaLcEIekXE76SOZY7s5J79hcCX7/bCnNkAVyPquDKAGm3BeXRELIz0N3VezLqNdmISKzd5U= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3015.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org > Sorry for the late reply. I was going to finish all the paperwork before > continuing, but it takes too long. Do you know the current status of it? Unfortunately we can't accept the patches without it. >> Anyway what I was really asking is if you ran the gdb testsuite. > I've run the testsuite locally. When patch is applied I get one > additional 'KFAIL ingdb.threads/process-dies-while-handling-bp.exp'. > But this test seems to be flaky on my machine and if I rerun it in > master, it also fails. Yeah, there are some flaky tests. Tom