From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11777 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2012 15:23:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 11722 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Apr 2012 15:23:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:23:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3RFNAHd021639 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:23:10 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3RFN9eA024378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:23:09 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Subject: Re: [RFA] MIPS16 FP manual call/return fixes References: <87r4va71oo.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Maciej W. Rozycki's message of "Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:13:57 +0100") Message-ID: <87lilh5hcy.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00994.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Maciej" == Maciej W Rozycki writes: Maciej> So this was a red herring after all, the argument in question Maciej> is NULL here, Ok, thanks. I'm sorry I didn't notice this. Tom