From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9601 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2012 13:47:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 9593 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Aug 2012 13:47:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:47:38 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7ODlYAR009754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:47:35 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7ODlXl1019174 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:47:33 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: "Metzger\, Markus T" Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" , "markus.t.metzger\@gmail.com" , "jan.kratochvil\@redhat.com" , "palves\@redhat.com" , "kettenis\@gnu.org" , "dje\@google.com" Subject: Re: [patch v3 01/16] gdbserver, build: add -DGDBSERVER References: <1345017496-26731-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <87d32hr7r2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:47:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Markus T. Metzger's message of "Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:36:41 +0000") Message-ID: <87lih4mmfe.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00720.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Markus" == Metzger, Markus T writes: Markus> Thanks. Just to clarify, when you say it's ok, this means that the Markus> changes have been approved and someone may commit them on my behalf, Markus> correct? Yeah, or you can do it. Contact me off-list and I will set you up with write-after-approval access to the repository. Markus> Did you look at the other patches, as well? The first four are rather Markus> small and generic. It would be good if they could be committed Markus> independently. This would shorten the series which might make it Markus> easier to review the rest. I haven't yet, but thanks for the note, I will look at those. Tom