From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15558 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2012 18:24:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 15539 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2012 18:24:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 18:24:38 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA9IObmS032199 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 13:24:37 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA9IOadg020500 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Nov 2012 13:24:37 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Multi-process + multi-arch: GDB References: <20121109015149.13597.39322.stgit@brno.lan> Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 18:24:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20121109015149.13597.39322.stgit@brno.lan> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 09 Nov 2012 01:51:50 +0000") Message-ID: <87lieaeisb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> +/* This is a convenience wrapper for 'current_inferior ()->gdbarch'. */ Pedro> +#define target_gdbarch get_target_gdbarch () Pedro> +extern struct gdbarch *get_target_gdbarch (void); I think object-like macros that expand to functions make the code harder to read. I can write up a patch to fix this if you agree. Tom