From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8380 invoked by alias); 10 May 2013 14:34:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8371 invoked by uid 89); 10 May 2013 14:34:31 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 May 2013 14:34:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4AEYRij012707 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 May 2013 10:34:27 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-133.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.133]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4AEYPf1002018 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 10 May 2013 10:34:27 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] add cleanup checker and fix cleanup bugs References: <20130510082304.GG9160@adacore.com> Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 14:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130510082304.GG9160@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Fri, 10 May 2013 12:23:04 +0400") Message-ID: <87li7mhpji.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00389.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> I like it! I am wondering if this is something that we could run Joel> nightly, either as part of the ARI, or in addition to it? Does the ARI run do a full build? I assume most people working on gdb use gcc. It is really easy to build the plugin. We could just ask developers to try it on their patch as part of submitting it. More ideally I'd like gdb to use gerrit and have patches be automatically checked as part of the submission process. I think this would be better than post hoc checking, or requiring everybody to have a long checklist of things to do. Tom