From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-107048-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9756 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2013 21:54:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 9747 invoked by uid 89); 7 Nov 2013 21:54:46 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RDNS_NONE,SPAM_SUBJECT,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 21:54:45 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA7LsbRc025536	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:54:38 -0500
Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-94.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.94])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rA7Lsa8D032445	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:54:37 -0500
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [patch][python] Fix python/14513
References: <5239A7E9.8010202@redhat.com> <877gedub9p.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<523A0E4E.3090105@redhat.com> <8738p1uam6.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<524BE7B3.3030805@redhat.com> <87mwm2i8vi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<5270CAC7.5050607@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 03:18:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <5270CAC7.5050607@redhat.com> (Phil Muldoon's message of "Wed, 30	Oct 2013 09:00:55 +0000")
Message-ID: <87li0zswrn.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00215.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Phil" == Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com> writes:

>> I've been thinking about it more and I don't understand why we want to
>> print anything in the "set" command.
>> I think it's fine if we just don't call a method.
>> What do you think of that?

Phil> I am fine with it, as long as you are.

Yeah, let's drop it if possible.

Tom