From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-111134-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24850 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2014 14:38:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 24836 invoked by uid 89); 14 Mar 2014 14:38:28 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:38:28 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2EEcO65015339	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:38:25 -0400
Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-169.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.169])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s2EEcNaL030719	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:38:24 -0400
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Return error code in get_number
References: <1394677950-4054-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com>	<87d2hqku59.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <532253C8.7050507@codesourcery.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:38:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <532253C8.7050507@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Fri, 14	Mar 2014 08:56:40 +0800")
Message-ID: <87lhwckfq8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00332.txt.bz2

Yao> I'd like to teach mi_cmd_break_commands to accept convenience variable,

Yeah -- but why?

It seems to me that an MI client already knows all the breakpoint
numbers.  I'm having trouble picturing the scenario where I'd want my MI
client to use a convenience variable instead.

Tom