From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31835 invoked by alias); 8 May 2014 21:33:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31822 invoked by uid 89); 8 May 2014 21:33:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 May 2014 21:33:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s48LXuaa025786 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 8 May 2014 17:33:56 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-185.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.185]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s48LXtI6022832 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 8 May 2014 17:33:55 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] handle VLA in a struct or union References: <1399574816-12845-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <1399574816-12845-3-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <20140508210914.GE4063@adacore.com> Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 21:33:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20140508210914.GE4063@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Thu, 8 May 2014 14:09:14 -0700") Message-ID: <87lhucuf98.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 Joel> ... where rtype is the resolved type being constructed, and therefore Joel> a type that isn't completely consistent yet. the call to Joel> value_from_contents_and_address eventually leads to the is_dynamic_type Joel> call. Thanks Joel. Joel> I think I need to review that code, as I do that a litte little Joel> later in the function again. I'll send another update when I have Joel> more info on this. I will try to look at it again tomorrow, don't spend too much effort on it. Tom