From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 67306 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2018 03:06:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 67297 invoked by uid 89); 30 Aug 2018 03:06:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 03:06:02 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1502040216E7; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 03:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unused-10-15-17-196.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.17.196]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED75F621B8; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 03:06:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: David Edelsohn Subject: Re: Breakage on builder RHEL-s390x-m64, revision 7a6dbc2fdb2323c35e981f93236f323e9d7c0b24 References: <7a6dbc2fdb2323c35e981f93236f323e9d7c0b24-master-breakage@gdb-build> <87tvndm8je.fsf@redhat.com> <87a7p4lx9u.fsf@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 03:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87a7p4lx9u.fsf@redhat.com> (Sergio Durigan Junior's message of "Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:42:53 -0400") Message-ID: <87lg8ok0yv.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-08/txt/msg00813.txt.bz2 On Wednesday, August 29 2018, I wrote: > On Wednesday, August 29 2018, I wrote: > >> On Wednesday, August 29 2018, gdb-buildbot wrote: >> >>> Unfortunately it seems that there is a breakage on GDB. >>> >>> Commit title: 'Update gnulib to current upstream master' >>> Revision: 7a6dbc2fdb2323c35e981f93236f323e9d7c0b24 >> >> I'm investigating this. > > Hello, David, > > After my last commit, which updated GDB's local copy of gnulib, I'm > seeing a breakage on the RHEL 7.1 s390x builder (see the rest of the > quoted message). Unfortunately I don't have easy access to a similar > machine, so I would like to know if: > > 1) You could help me with investigating this a bit more, or > > 2) You could grant me temporary access to the machine so I can > investigate the problem. > > I would like to know a few things: > > a) Why is GCC apparently not using the C99 mode when compiling gnulib. > This is causing the "=E2=80=98for=E2=80=99 loop initial declarations are = only allowed in > C99 mode" error. > > b) Is there a "stddef.h" file in the build dir? Does it declare > "max_align_t"? This is causing the "unknown type name =E2=80=98max_align= _t=E2=80=99" > error. > > Thanks in advance, Hi again, David, As it turns out, I managed to reproduce the problem locally here, so there's no need for the temporary access anymore. Thanks, --=20 Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/