From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Enable undefined behavior sanitizer
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:49:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lg87j5rl.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180830024416.23386-1-tom@tromey.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Wed, 29 Aug 2018 20:44:06 -0600")
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> writes:
Tom> This is v2 of the series to enable the undefined behavior sanitizer
Tom> for gdb. This is done by default in development mode, but can be
Tom> disabled.
Update on this series...
Tom> I believe this version addresses all the review comments.
For the record, subsequently, Pedro and I discussed the need to document
this a bit more. I'll include a patch for this in the next revision of
the series.
Tom> Tested (*) by the buildbot.
Tom> (*) However, as I mentioned in another thread, the s390 builders do
Tom> not like this series. I get many, many failures. Looking at the
Tom> gdb.log, though, the failures seem to be coming from libstdc++ debug
Tom> mode -- which this series does not enable.
This is all explained now.
Sergio pointed out that the builders are enabling -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG. I'm
glad that mystery is solved.
A failure with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG enabled just results in a crash, without
much useful information to go by. This is often fine, but in this case
I could only reproduce on s390, where I couldn't log in to reproduce for
myself.
So, I hacked the testsuite Makefile to run just a single test .exp that
I knew to fail, and then arranged to get a real stack trace. See the
appended patch.
This pointed out that there was a bug in one of the patches in the series.
Namely, this code in dwarf2-frame.c:
struct dwarf2_frame_state_reg *retaddr_reg =
&fs.regs.reg[fs.retaddr_column];
... will reference past the end of the array in some cases. When reg is
just an ordinary pointer this is "ok" -- possibly undefined behavior
depending on the index in use, but not likely to cause a crash. But the
series changes reg to a std::vector, where this is invalid.
Tom
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/Makefile.in b/gdb/testsuite/Makefile.in
index 07e0928a9f8..3bfc4d9f847 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/Makefile.in
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/Makefile.in
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ EXPECT = `if [ "$${READ1}" != "" ] ; then \
RUNTEST = $(RUNTEST_FOR_TARGET)
-RUNTESTFLAGS =
+override RUNTESTFLAGS := gdb.cp/extern-c.exp
FORCE_PARALLEL =
@@ -153,7 +153,11 @@ CHECK_TARGET = $(if $(RACY_ITER),$(addsuffix -racy,$(CHECK_TARGET_TMP)),$(CHECK_
# because GNU make 3.82 has a bug preventing MAKEFLAGS from being used
# in conditions.
check: all $(abs_builddir)/site.exp
- $(MAKE) $(CHECK_TARGET)
+ -$(MAKE) $(CHECK_TARGET)
+ cat gdb.log
+ /bin/gdb -batch -ex 'run' -ex 'bt' \
+ --args ../gdb -batch -ex 'file outputs/gdb.cp/extern-c/extern-c' \
+ -ex 'break c_func' -ex 'run' -ex 'rbreak c_funcs'
check-read1:
$(MAKE) READ1="1" check
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-12 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-30 2:44 Tom Tromey
2018-08-30 2:44 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] Avoid undefined behavior in read_subrange_type Tom Tromey
2018-08-30 2:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] Add --enable-ubsan Tom Tromey
2018-08-30 2:44 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] Avoid undefined behavior in expression dumping Tom Tromey
2018-08-30 2:44 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] Use unsigned as base type for some enums Tom Tromey
2018-08-30 2:44 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] Do not pass NULL to memcpy Tom Tromey
2018-08-30 2:44 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] Avoid undefined behavior in ada_operator_length Tom Tromey
2018-08-30 2:44 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] Avoid undefined behavior in parse_number Tom Tromey
2018-08-30 2:44 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] Avoid undefined behavior in extract_integer Tom Tromey
2018-08-30 2:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] Change dwarf2_frame_state_reg_info::reg to be std::vector Tom Tromey
2018-08-30 2:44 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] Avoid undefined behavior in read_signed_leb128 Tom Tromey
2018-09-12 11:49 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lg87j5rl.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox