From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 50121 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2019 14:02:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 50108 invoked by uid 89); 20 Sep 2019 14:02:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: gateway23.websitewelcome.com Received: from gateway23.websitewelcome.com (HELO gateway23.websitewelcome.com) (192.185.49.219) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 14:02:26 +0000 Received: from cm10.websitewelcome.com (cm10.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.4]) by gateway23.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B80CB1C8 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:02:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id BJUNihE0W2PzOBJUNiYgU0; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:02:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=IrJ01UsCEVjLhcXawZKG9YHCOau6BK6YYi2lTW3eD4o=; b=dwVCdbgSyhmHZYpO63n4oKntjC tQRZSjPyZ2XnmMYXvvxx0K9Y3ZPeCjbKlpjEYeUl0s7nMDZxs/jPIpfmW+cA0VpCI/E/Xu+z5uMmy +d8tiFxh1pdzYbkR8Sd8u/KpQ; Received: from 71-218-73-27.hlrn.qwest.net ([71.218.73.27]:35670 helo=murgatroyd) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iBJUN-002MDo-Gm; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:02:23 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Simon Marchi Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Remove some uses of iterate_over_inferiors References: <20190919212825.7586-1-tom@tromey.com> <84bd60f3-2a9f-ac45-cf6e-f2823ecca44c@simark.ca> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 14:02:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <84bd60f3-2a9f-ac45-cf6e-f2823ecca44c@simark.ca> (Simon Marchi's message of "Thu, 19 Sep 2019 22:15:40 -0400") Message-ID: <87lfujqd5d.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00400.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi writes: Simon> I was just wondering, why did you choose to use Simon> all_inferiors_safe in all these cases, rather than all_inferiors? Simon> At first sight, they don't seem to be cases where an inferior can Simon> be deleted. Is it maybe that it's simpler to just use the "safe" Simon> version and there's no disadvantage to it? It was just more obviously correct, because that's what iterate_over_inferiors uses. Tom