From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id rRR5Ni1ii2jG0QAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:31:41 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id D07771E102; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:31:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 251821E091 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:31:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DB03858C2F for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 12:31:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B9DB03858C2F Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D15D3858D1E; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 12:31:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 7D15D3858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 7D15D3858D1E Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1753965068; cv=none; b=sX6i5EpYUQ7OA98SrhA4pJ7dzrTtvS2nEIgtA2KYILiphFEYsnFmFiK3dpucLMIsmDI4fnTsljVNP8V3iELX7FqFMPLTA1sYgSvQWgn/i3ztGkOyA7S0aDd5TIiSf/o8c7oSOuFFMKB3bFXQuYZMoipyS2oJ0XoQkrwUxGae/Pw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1753965068; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aSNotOPISVEfVNiwtsd9a2K726p5arzo1+PF7CZit/k=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=bEk3O2m6T51K7pmSLU4rsJEQvSO/T4GRkUjIldXv7JKJpX7AP0bc58ousC9UVzrEXG/aNfpbEyCBLRM1FWotC2O5hO93qoV5RgaktGHh/Ig5ZTxymT6XUdThh3RSDCYctftpDB6iMHHNB0zVQ13LoXwr39HpJnpqDvXqLLIPLr8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7D15D3858D1E Received: from mop.sam.mop (unknown [82.8.138.118]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange secp256r1 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sam) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 990E4341052; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 12:31:04 +0000 (UTC) From: Sam James To: Nick Clifton Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: Any objections to rebasing the zlib sources to 1.3.1 ? In-Reply-To: <87h5yslfkq.fsf@redhat.com> Organization: Gentoo References: <87h5yslfkq.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.11; emacs 31.0.50 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 13:31:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87ldo435kp.fsf@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Nick Clifton writes: > Hi Guys, Hi Nick, > > Are there any objections to rebasing the zlib sources in the > gdb-binutils repository to version 1.3.1 ? (Patch attached). > > Apart from just the general good practice of using the latest released > version of the sources, this is also in response to PR 33097 which > reports that the current zlib sources do not build under MacOS. I have it ready to go already. It's been approved on the GCC side, I just can't push it yet because of a hook issue. My plan is once it's pushed there to sync it in the binutils-gdb tree. > > Cheers > Nick > > [2. application/x-xz; zlib.rebase.patch.xz]... sam