From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22797 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2002 05:32:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22785 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2002 05:32:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gash2.peakpeak.com) (207.174.178.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Jun 2002 05:32:46 -0000 Received: from fleche.redhat.com (ta0206.peakpeak.com [204.144.244.206]) by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA04743 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 23:32:43 -0600 Received: by fleche.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 62C6A4F80AA; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 23:45:51 -0600 (MDT) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: next gettextization step References: <877kkqq6y8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <3D17D59A.1000308@cygnus.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: I'm thinking about DIGITAL READ-OUT systems and computer-generated IMAGE FORMATIONS.. Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 22:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3D17D59A.1000308@cygnus.com> Message-ID: <87k7onhpww.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00505.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Cagney writes: Andrew> If I understand things correctly, the main.c change can go in Andrew> without the po/ change? The configure.in patch can also be Andrew> split in two leaving out the po/ part? There's no point in splitting the configure.in patch. The PACKAGE subst is only used by po/Make-in. Andrew> If this is correct then those parts are free to go in. Thanks, I'm checking in the main.c change. Andrew> I'd like to see the po/ directory issues resolved (I've sent Andrew> an e-mail to binutils) before that is also created. Ok. Feel free to CC me on that discussion if you like. Tom