From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16561 invoked by alias); 7 May 2012 20:38:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 16458 invoked by uid 22791); 7 May 2012 20:38:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 May 2012 20:37:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q47KbTL9012742 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 7 May 2012 16:37:29 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q47KbRib024979 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 7 May 2012 16:37:28 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Cc: , , Subject: Re: [RFA] Emit a warning for ineffective set VAR = EXP command References: <8781499A-A489-42D0-80B1-75136331DBDB@adacore.com> <874nrryeap.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 20:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Paul Koning's message of "Mon, 7 May 2012 19:39:44 +0000") Message-ID: <87k40nwwvs.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00200.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Paul" == writes: Paul> What would ++ do if your current language is Ada, or Fortran? Paul> Complain about syntax error? The expression is parsed according to the current language. So, yes, syntax error, assuming this is invalid in Ada or Fortran. Tom