Re: RFC: one approach to fixing PR 14100

Tom Tromey
2012-08-09T20:12:20Z

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

Mark> Sorry, but I really think you're working around a problem in the
Mark> tailcall sniffer here. The tailcall sniffer seems to violate several
Mark> of the design principles of the frame unwinder framework. It should
Mark> be fixed instead.

Jan> Could you be more specific?

I also don't know what design principles it is violating, but I'd like
to.

Also, FWIW, there's at least one other sniffer that resets the cache to
NULL upon deciding to give up. I can find it again if it matters.

Tom