From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24926 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2012 14:56:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 24918 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Oct 2012 14:56:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:56:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9OEuKq4018623 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:56:20 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9OEuJUO032235 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:56:20 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Yao Qi Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix kfail in gdb.base/callfuncs.exp References: <1350301607-16574-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <877gqhf2uk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <50879C02.4040106@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:56:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <50879C02.4040106@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:42:58 +0800") Message-ID: <87k3ufapgs.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00447.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi writes: Yao> This proc is to link the same fail to different PRs according to Yao> different target triplets (See more here Yao> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-05/msg00508.html). For Yao> example, in gdb.base/varargs.exp Ok, I see. Thanks. Yao> The patch below is to replace 'setup_kfail_for_target' with Yao> 'setup_kfail', and add one sentence of comment to proc Yao> 'setup_kfail_for_target'. Is it OK? Looks good to me, thanks. Tom