From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29520 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2012 19:15:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 29510 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2012 19:15:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:14:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qATJEhHT015170 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:14:43 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qATJEfQ1012413 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:14:42 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Hui Zhu Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CTF support to GDB [2/4] Fix a bug of function dwarf_expr_frame_base References: <50AC322D.2030209@mentor.com> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:15:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <50AC322D.2030209@mentor.com> (Hui Zhu's message of "Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:45:17 +0800") Message-ID: <87k3t45ihq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00888.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Hui" == Hui Zhu writes: Hui> 2012-11-20 Hui Zhu Hui> * dwarf2loc.c (dwarf_expr_frame_base): Add check for the return Hui> value of get_frame_block. I think this is reasonable even without the rest of your patches. One nit: Hui> + if (bl == NULL) Hui> + error (_("No symbol table info available.\n")); I don't think this is a very clear error message. I'm not sure what else to suggest though. Also, no \n at the end of the error message. Tom