From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28253 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2013 16:02:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 28235 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Feb 2013 16:02:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:02:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r16G2jcZ023719 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:02:45 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r16G2hW9016078 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:02:44 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Doug Evans , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches Subject: Re: [patchv3 13/11] Make relative-with-system-absolute the default References: <20130129221118.GB27463@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130130074859.GB15998@host2.jankratochvil.net> <831ud2ioax.fsf@gnu.org> <20130202180658.GA16269@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130205182245.GA19307@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:02:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130205182245.GA19307@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Tue, 5 Feb 2013 19:22:45 +0100") Message-ID: <87k3qlxwf0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00147.txt.bz2 Doug> I can also imagine wanting system supplied separate debug info Doug> treated differently from separate debug info files for the app Doug> being debugged. Are you saying this is something you actively want? Or something that someone might conceivably want? If the latter, then I suggest we not do it until someone presents a reason that they need it. To me it seems like a complication that, in practice, nobody would use. If you actively want it, could you say why? I'm having difficulty picturing the scenario in which it would be useful. Tom