From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12432 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2013 19:54:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 12420 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2013 19:54:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 19:54:38 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1SJsaJO013928 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:54:36 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1SJsZU6021413 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:54:35 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Pedro Alves , Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] gdb/CONTRIBUTE update References: <20130221202629.GA30015@host2.jankratochvil.net> <512C80DA.5070600@codesourcery.com> <20130226093829.GA5802@host2.jankratochvil.net> <512C9996.6000007@redhat.com> <20130226131213.GA15184@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:01:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130226131213.GA15184@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:12:13 +0100") Message-ID: <87k3psw6x0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00767.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> Besides that there are other mailers like VM/Gnus which also may Jan> not have thre thread-by-most-recent-reply sorting, not sure. gnus works fine here. It doesn't sort this way (at least not for me, I didn't look to see if it can), but it marks new messages regardless of where they appear in the sorting. I suppose I have a slight preference for posting as a follow-up. But I will cope with anything. Jan> Unfortunately whatever method we find out it always is a pain, the Jan> reviewing process should be supported by projects like Gerrit. I think we owe it to patch submitters to do this. Pings don't really seem to be working. Tom