From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15303 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2013 16:27:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 15227 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Mar 2013 16:27:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:27:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r21GR9SH025285 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:27:09 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r21GR7fT021943 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:27:08 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Pedro Alves , Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] gdb/CONTRIBUTE update References: <20130221202629.GA30015@host2.jankratochvil.net> <512C80DA.5070600@codesourcery.com> <20130226093829.GA5802@host2.jankratochvil.net> <512C9996.6000007@redhat.com> <20130226131213.GA15184@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87k3psw6x0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20130228212725.GA1848@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:27:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130228212725.GA1848@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:27:25 +0100") Message-ID: <87k3prulus.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 Tom> I think we owe it to patch submitters to do this. Tom> Pings don't really seem to be working. Jan> I did not get what should the submitters do if even pings do not work. I was thinking of automated pings. Ideally there's really no need for pings if the list of unreviewed patches is maintained by a tool rather than by each of us in our own inbox -- but a weekly automated report or something wouldn't hurt. Tom