From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17313 invoked by alias); 14 May 2013 20:21:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17271 invoked by uid 89); 14 May 2013 20:21:30 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 May 2013 20:21:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4EKLNxB003109 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 14 May 2013 16:21:23 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-133.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.133]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4EKLLuO021481 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 14 May 2013 16:21:22 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 V3] target-assisted range stepping References: <20130514191026.13213.39574.stgit@brno.lan> Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 20:21:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130514191026.13213.39574.stgit@brno.lan> (Pedro Alves's message of "Tue, 14 May 2013 20:10:27 +0100") Message-ID: <87k3n148ji.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00499.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> It took a while, but finally here's my take on the range stepping Pedro> series. This is based on Yao's v1 and v2 series, so I'm calling it Pedro> v3. The gist of the feature is the same, although the implementation Pedro> in both GDB and GDBserver is a different. I read through the series and commented where I could. I don't know enough to comment intelligently on the main patch (#3). The test suite patch seemed fine to me. Tom