From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14994 invoked by alias); 30 May 2013 16:17:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14983 invoked by uid 89); 30 May 2013 16:17:59 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 May 2013 16:17:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4UGHvgr009470 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 12:17:57 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-72.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.72]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4UGHunI010488 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 30 May 2013 12:17:57 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] add cleanup checker and fix cleanup bugs References: Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 16:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Thu, 09 May 2013 12:47:06 -0600") Message-ID: <87k3mgsaq3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg01085.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> This series adds a cleanup checker and then fixes most of the bugs it Tom> notices. I am checking most of this in. For now, I'm leaving out the patch that adds the new "dangling_cleanup" attribute. I'm not completely comfortable with papering over problems like that, even hard ones; and Pedro found a couple of spots in it where the problem could be fixed without too much trouble. I'm also not checking in the scoped cleanup change -- it wasn't part of this series, but it is on the branch, for those looking there. I plan to revise and resubmit this one. Tom> The series as a whole was built and regression-tested on x86-64 Tom> Fedora 18. I rebased and re-tested this. Tom