From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3018 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2013 19:05:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2855 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jun 2013 19:05:29 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 19:05:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5SJ5R9X023916 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:05:28 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-102.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.102]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5SIK8H1031904 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:20:10 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] Normalize on PATH_MAX instead of MAXPATHLEN throughout. References: <20130627185200.6625.10526.stgit@brno.lan> <20130627185257.6625.19906.stgit@brno.lan> <87mwqal0w4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <51CDD063.5060605@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 19:08:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <51CDD063.5060605@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 28 Jun 2013 19:05:23 +0100") Message-ID: <87k3lejdwo.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00923.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> I don't think we presently run the autoconf checks with Pedro> -Ignulib/import, so we still need to check for headers that are Pedro> used in HAVE_FOO in configure tests explicitly. Maybe we should Pedro> (run these checks with -Ignulib/import, or include gnulib's Pedro> config.h while running these tests, but I don't think the latter Pedro> would work), but I'd prefer treading with caution, and Pedro> considering that a separate change. We also check for other Pedro> headers that we have gnulib replacements for, so such a change Pedro> can do all of them in one pass. Thanks, this makes sense to me. Tom